Teatro de
la Zarzuela
The 2013-14 season
unveiled
Editorial by Christopher
Webber |
 Director of Instituto Nacional
de las Artes Escénicas y de la Música (Inaem), Miguel
Ángel Recio, with Paolo Pinamonti
|
a programme
“dictated by PR and economics over aesthetic
sense”?
Our sympathies must go to Paolo Pinamonti, tasked with the
idea of putting together a coherent 2013-14 season at Teatro de la
Zarzuela. He must carry forward a history of over 150 years history of
musico-theatrical innovation, while simultaneously satisfying a loyal, older
public which “knows what it wants”, trying to attract new
audiences, and interesting schoolchildren in the genre itself and the work of
the building. All this at a time and place when there is no money to spend on
the arts, or anything else. Truly he is not to be envied.
To what extent have he and his
planning team succeeded in squaring the circles? Looking first at the main
meat, most people will be delighted to see a new Curro Vargas promised
(Feb-Mar 2014) to be staged by the globetrotting English director Graham
Vick. Chapí’s three-act epic has been too long absent, and
following the innovative production of Viento es la dicha de Amor
we’ll have another intriguing Baroque confection drawn from the
tonos of Juan Hidalgo and his contemporaries, under the title De lo
humano … y lo divino [Anatomía de las pasiones] (May
2014), with the Capilla de Música Santa María under
musical director Carlos Mena. For nostalgic purposes – and box
office bliss! – there is the umpteenth revival of Emilio
Sagi’s rather tired 1990 production of La del manojo de rosas
(December 2013-January 2014).
That’s it for single,
integrated shows. The remainder of the staged programme consists of two
particularly silly examples of double bills. Now double bills are a great
thing, and highly appropriate for a genre many of whose greatest riches are of
short, género chico dimensions. But double bills have to make
sense, and neither of these do. To stick La verbena de la Paloma with
Falla’s Los amores de la Inés has antiquarian interest only
– if it weren’t for the name on the cover nobody would bother to
stage such a musically and dramatically faceless squib as this great
composer’s least convincing juvenilia. It’s pure snobbery to spend
money on this whilst being blind to the many short Bretón zarzuelas
which most people who love his masterpiece La verbena… would die
to see. The excellent director José Carlos Plaza will have his
work cut out with Falla’s nullity, though at least it is very short.
Then, taking a deep breath, we come to the most unnatural act of
coupling I’ve ever come across in the theatre (rivalled only by
ENO’s sometime attempt to weld Gianni Schicchi to
Bluebeard’s Castle) – a truncated version of
Sorozábal’s Black el payaso with Leoncavallo’s
opera Pagliacci (April 2014). [please note
TdlZ: the title is not I pagliacci, as Sr. Pinamonti of all people ought
to know] Two clowns? No, three: because one has to include the clown
who came up with such a monumentally stupid concept. Somebody evidently left
their brains at home when it came to the planning meeting. Pagliacci
will be sung in Italian, by a Spanish cast, which adds insult to injury. Why
sing in a language nobody in Madrid understands? Is this an attempt to drag in
the tourists? It will certainly have Barbieri - who founded this very theatre
to wean Madrid off cheap Italian opera - rolling furiously in his grave.
Artistically, there is
absolutely nothing to link these two pieces, beyond the trivial fact that Black
cries out “ridi, pagliacco!” towards the end of
Anguita’s tart operetta-satire. When there are so many short
Sorozábal works (including one, La guitarra de Figaro, with a
‘varieties’ setting) it is perverse to shove a cut version of one
of his major works on in tandem with a superannuated Italian warhorse.
Aesthetically, they cancel one another out. Who wants it? Well, director
Ignacio García has ‘form’. His attempt to link the
Gaztambide and Barbieri works in his last doble assignment here was
nearly disastrous, and I can only give him a gypsy’s warning not to
attempt the same trick here. This has to be the most aberrant programming I
have ever seen from a major opera theatre. “Ridi, pagliacco”
by all means – there’s nothing else to do faced with such
nonsense.
I’ve saved the best until last: these desperate
dobles are redeemed by the inclusion, in concert only but at least in
multiple performances, of three important 19th century revivals:
Gaztambide’s Catalina, Arrieta’s El dominó azul
and Barbieri’s El Diablo en el poder (June 2014). All will be
conducted by José María Moreno. Whether with dialogue or
not, is not clear. But thank you for this, Sr. Pinamonti. This is what Teatro
de la Zarzuela should be about, not – with respect – purveying
hackneyed old Italian schlock which you can see any day of the week in
second-rate opera theatres all over the world.
There’s the usual selection of dance
evenings, concerts, solo recitals and special events of which several are
pleasant in prospect. Rafael Frühbeck de Burgos is once again
programmed to present La tempranica in concert, with María
José Montiel and Carlos Bergasa (21/22 September 2013). There
is another of those marvellous Christmas concerts (Concierto de Navidad,
23 December 2013). And the two zarzuelas para niños at
Universidad Carlos III are as interesting as anything in the main
programme. These are Arriaga’s charming juvenilia La princesa
árabe (January 2014) and Valverde hijo’s El
paraíso de los niños, the ‘fantasy children’s
zarzuela’ in one act to a text by Delgado and Arniches (April 2014).
In sum, there’s plenty to look forward to, despite a thin
main-stage programme with no sense of overall coherence and some very
questionable choices (notably the Falla and Leoncavallo components) which seem
dictated by PR and economics rather than aesthetic compulsion. Teatro de la
Zarzuela’s 2013-14 season looks too much like a ‘committee
job’ put together to satisfy Peter and Paul (or rather, Pedro y
Paolo) and too little like one man’s imaginative vision. Given the
times, perhaps that is inevitable. But once again, there is a feeling of
disappointment that Teatro de la Zarzuela is failing to live up to the
innovative ideals of its great founders, but rather choosing to trail along in
the wake of the best modern, operatic theatre of our time.
© Christopher Webber, 20/V/2013
Teatro de la Zarzuela: 2013-14 PDF
brochure
zarzuela.net
20/V/2013 |