|
El Gato Montés More than just that pasodoble ... Enormous expectation preceded the first genuinely national zarzuela production of Christoph Loy – not strictly his zarzuela debut in Spain, since a few weeks ago his Barberillo could be seen in Oviedo – fervent recruit to Hispanic lyric theatre, champion of its patterns, knowledgeable enthusiast and unapologetic defender of the manifold virtues of Spain’s musico-theatrical heritage. Since El Gato Montés (‘The Wildcat’) is a work loaded with topical patriotic connotations, curiosity about Loy’s approach from such a cosmopolitan globalist perspective was even stronger. The final result, let’s admit right away, is mixed: it contains very positive and impactful elements, destabilised by others in which the German director does not live up to his reputation. His primary interest in distilling the tragedy is clear: the omnipresence of Death on the stage and in the dramatic journey (the apparition foreshadowing the bullfighter’s goring in the second act, and again in the final scene is visually very strong); the protagonists’ emotional helplessness; passion and unbridled jealousy; the social marginalization of the ‘other’, and the primitive, earthy purity of first love … all these in a closed, claustrophobic environment, constricting the characters. Even in the final scene – supposedly set in the mountains – the stage walls continue to envelop the dying lovers, and it will be precisely Death itself which opens the door, not as an end but as a liberation from that social, sentimental ultimate cage of life. In relation to these elements, Loy achieves the evening’s most striking images: another pillar of his work is the composition and resolution of the men’s duel over Soleá, with its contrast between black and white and its overall, powerful formalism.
On the other hand, his staging blurs the popular and ‘characteristic’ components, as demonstrated by the soulless and prosaic exposition of the off-stage bullfight [with its famous pasodoble] and the excessive stylization of the sets – most especially the costumes, with their preponderance of suits, jackets and ties (the aversion of today’s directors for period dress makes an interesting question). An unbecoming clumsiness of such a seasoned director as Loy is the lack of import in the successive entries of key characters such as the protagonists or the Gypsy, who always emerge in a rather pedestrian and bland way at the edges of the stage, at times to involuntarily comedic effect. The voluminous settings occupy the entire back of the stage, thus preventing frontal perspectives on these characters, who thus lose tragic imprint and theatrical force. And one last comment, no less important: there are too many interruptions and intervals in the evening, which break dramatic tension and audience concentration rather too much. On the face of it, the scenic changes do not seem to require so much time, but I’ll leave that debate to Those Who Know.
I was able to see the two alternative casts, and on the whole it can be said that the balance tilts favourably towards the first. In the title role, neither David Oller nor Borja Quiza manage to completely satisfy. The first by default and the second by excess are far from the troubled personality of that wounded ‘Wildcat’, so battered in body and soul. Oller’s voice is very light for a role of this dramatic substance, aside from the fact that his technical support is very basic. The sounds arise moment by moment and his singing lacks fluency; it springs up and then stumbles, with little connection between the notes, manifesting an excess of vibrato and with more tendency to declamation than true singing. This lack of legato prevents him from shining forth in the most lyrical moments, while in the moments of greatest sonic impetus he is out of bounds. His acting could also be greatly improved. Quiza, on the other hand, has been for some time now overfond of vocal volume, reflected in abrupt, high-mettled, uncontrolled singing, with an abundance of open and bland sounds, which at times even causes his tuning to suffer. Occasionally, in this or that phrase, or in some vocal gesture, this stentorian style serves to embody the character of ‘The Wildcat’, but such moments are fleeting.
The theatre’s musical director, José Miguel Pérez-Sierra, was conducting both these performances (in the last three he will be replaced by Rafael Sánchez-Araña). He performs appreciably as a whole, far from his usual inclination towards sheer sonic volume, although his taste for excessive decibels still sometimes gets the better of him, as in the choral entrance greeting Raphael in the first act. He maintains a lively theatrical pulse, very effective and fluent, demonstrating particularly well-balanced musical phrasing in the orchestral interludes. What was lacking, was greater refinement in extracting all the instrumental colours and abundant timbral piquancy that Penella’s work contains – this is a very estimable composition in that aspect, a far cry from the castanet-and-tambourine fest that malicious tongues have claimed it to be down the decades. As a curiosity I must note that in addition to the various musical interludes indicated in the score, an orchestral version of the work’s central theme, ‘Juntos dende chavaliyos’, was added during one of those many pauses for scenic changes, a recurring melody of ineffable tenderness, which the composer uses throughout the score as a consolatory haven to temper the sentimental boyish orphanhood of the two protagonists. It is a great example of that ‘melodic spontaneity which attracts and captivates’, as defined by the young Reveriano Soutullo, who at the time of the work’s appearance took on the critics to explain Penella’s musical style. More than a century after its premiere, perennially battered and cancelled by highbrow critics, El Gato Montés maintains its popular freshness and its fascinating duende. It continues to attract and captivate. © Antonio Díaz-Casanova and zarzuela.net, 2026
16/VI/2026 |